Christasha McNeil vs Wakana Sonobe Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 12 Nov at 05:09 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. McNeil vs W. Sonobe

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: McNeil 1 - 0 Sonobe
They have played 2 sets in total, with Christasha McNeil winning 2 and Wakana Sonobe winning 0. The last match between Christasha McNeil and Wakana Sonobe was at the W50 Austin, 12-11-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Christasha McNeil getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| McNeil | 1 |
| Sonobe | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W50 Austin(11-12-25)
C. McNeil vs W. Sonobe H2H Profile
C. McNeil vs W. Sonobe Match Preview:
- Christasha Mc Neil has won 39.05% of points on her second serve, while Wakana Sonobe has a slightly better rate at 40.88% over the past six months. What could this mean for the match outcome? It might give Sonobe a small edge in second serve situations.
- In return games, Sonobe outperforms Mc Neil by winning 50.87% of opponents' second serve points compared to Mc Neil's 45.44%. When returning first serves, Sonobe again leads, winning 33.26% versus Mc Neil's 31.46%. Could this indicate a strong return performance from Sonobe?
- Under pressure, Sonobe has saved 50.00% of breakpoints when Mc Neil has saved 46.54%. This statistic suggests Sonobe might be more resilient in crucial moments.
- Both players have similar win percentages over the past year, with Mc Neil at 58.82% and Sonobe at 56.76%. Is this an indication the match could be closely contested?
- Their best surfaces differ: Mc Neil thrives on indoor hard courts with a 77% win rate, while Sonobe excels on outdoor hard courts with the same percentage. Could surface preference influence the match result?
- Mc Neil has faced lower-ranked opponents (average rank 447.22) compared to Sonobe's opponents (average rank 292.38) in the past year. Does this mean Sonobe has more experience against stronger competitors?
- When matches reach a deciding set, Mc Neil has shown resilience, winning 67% compared to Sonobe's 60%. Might this indicate an edge for Mc Neil in potential long matches?
- For break point conversion in recent form, Mc Neil converts at 42.28%, outperforming Sonobe's 38.69%. Could this give Mc Neil an advantage in critical moments?
Editorial Prediction (November 12, 2025, UTC):
As we examine the head-to-head statistics between Christasha Mc Neil and Wakana Sonobe, subtle distinctions in their performances emerge. Sonobe appears to have a slight advantage in second serve points won and return game effectiveness, which may translate into controlling key rallies during the match.
Sonobe's ability to handle pressure, as indicated by a higher breakpoint saving percentage, suggests she could maintain composure during crucial game junctures. Moreover, her experience against higher-ranked opponents might equip her better to handle challenges during the match.
However, Christasha Mc Neil is not without her strengths. Her superior break point conversion rate and promising record in deciding sets highlight her capability to perform when it matters most. Additionally, she excels on indoor hard courts, which could factor in if the surface accommodates her play style.
Despite the competitive outlook, Wakana Sonobe's consistent performance against higher-ranked players and her stronger return game could potentially provide her with the upper hand. Therefore, Sonobe is likely to win this upcoming tennis match.
Christasha McNeil vs Wakana Sonobe Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. McNeil vs W. Sonobe H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 8 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
| 2:1:2 | Average Match Time | 2:1:2 |
| 52% (34/65) | 1st Serve % | 50% (38/76) |
| 68% (23/34) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (26/38) |
| 55% (17/31) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (15/38) |
| 40% (4/10) | Break Pts Won % | 22% (2/9) |
| 46% (35/76) | Return Points Win % | 38% (25/65) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. McNeil Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-4 6-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-4 6-0 | ||
R1 | L | 6-0 6-2 | ||
W. Sonobe Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
R2 | L | 3-6 6-1 7-6(2) | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 6-0 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 7-5 6-2 | ||

C. McNeil vs W. Sonobe Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.09% (39/27) | YTD Win/Loss | 61.29% (57/36) |
| 56.58% (86/66) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.99% (128/89) |
| 52.24% (723/661) | Games Win/Loss | 54.64% (1066/885) |
| 57.58% (19/14) | Hard Win/Loss | 62.22% (28/17) |
| 50.00% (10/10) | Clay Win/Loss | 61.70% (29/18) |
| 76.92% (10/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
| 112 | Aces Total | 166 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.35 |
| 173 | Total Double Faults | 338 |
| 1:27:46 | Average Match Time | 1:32:18 |
| 414.68 | Average Opponent Rank | 396.48 |
| 59% (2167/3695) | 1st Serve % | 56% (3184/5669) |
| 64% (1391/2167) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (2047/3184) |
| 47% (721/1528) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (1133/2485) |
| 50% (218/434) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (359/707) |
| 44% (1645/3708) | Return Points Win % | 47% (2599/5531) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 50.00% (4/4) |
| 50.00% (19/19) | Challenger W/L | 59.18% (29/20) |
| 74.07% (20/7) | Futures W/L | 68.57% (24/11) |
| 59% (39/66) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (57/93) |
| 23% (3/13) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 44% (7/16) |
| 60% (12/20) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (17/31) |
| 89% (37/33) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (62/53) |
| 11% (37/4) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (62/9) |
| 21% (29/6) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (31/4) |